The bourgeois charm of karl marx & the ideological irony of american jurisprudence employs a well-known body of work, marx's, to explain the inevitable limits of scholarship, in hopes to encourage academic boldness, and diversity, especially within american jurisprudence. While scholarly meaning-making has been addressed in specific academic areas, mostly linguistics and philosophy, it has never been addressed in a triangular relationship between the text (t1) and its instigator (s1), as well as its subsequent interpellator (s2). Furthermore, while addressed as a result of difference, it has never been addressed for today's liberal theory, which includes liberal jurisprudence, through the mirror of marxist difference. Scholarship is the unique product of the instigator's private and public
{{comment.content}}