Introduction: Whither the ILO's Second Century? Persuasion at its Limits in the Global Economy I. The (false) dilemma: survival or integrity II. The real challenge: are 100-year-old institutional choices still valid in the twenty-first century? III. The core issue Part I Ninety Years of Transformations in the International System: Challenges Posed to ILO Persuasiveness 1. The Cold War and the trente glorieuses, a Not-Quite Golden Age for the ILO and its Persuasiveness 2. Globalisation Ascendant: The ILO's raison d'etre Restored - But the Gamble on Persuasion Nearly Lost I. Two decades of recurrent social disappointments and the corresponding demand for greater social regulation II. Which puts into question its capacity to meet the demand through the 'traditional' normative strategy 3. Have Recent Efforts at Institutional Renewal Already Fallen Behind the Pace of Change in the Economic Environment? I. A renewal in four stages II. Have the consequences of the financial crisis rendered the renewal old news? Part II The Proliferation of Multilateral Actors and the Challenge of Coherence 4. Social Goals: Doomed to Remain 'Country Cousins' of Economic Objectives at the Universal Level? I. From the pre-war marginalisation of the ILO's social objectives to the Declaration of Philadelphia's failed attempt at a hostile takeover II. The 'mandated' segregation of social considerations in the (former?) practice of the World Bank 5. Employment: Functional 'Common Ground' or Policy Fault-line? I. Employment: free-standing policy objective or economic windfall? II. The evolving employment dilemma: quantity vs quality III. The financial crisis: an (as yet) unexploited opportunity to give social objectives their due 6. Boosting the ILO's Capacity to Promote Coherence I. Promoting state-level coherence II. Pursuing coherence through inter-organisational dialogue III. Actively supporting the emergence of a relevant 'Epistemic Community' Part III ILO Influence and the Enduring Demand for Universal'Rules of the Game' 7. From the Impasse of the Social Clause Debate to the Delimitation of Fundamental Rights at Work as Shared 'Rules of the Game' I. From the misleading analogy of 'social dumping' II. Or ambiguous references to 'internationally recognised worker rights' III. To the ILO's functionalist approach, turning on 'fundamental rights as enabling rights' (and as potential rules of the game) 8. Can the Social 'Rules of the Game' be Made More Effective by Linking Them to Basic Trade Rules? I. Legitimacy, perceptions and barriers to a possible legal transplant II. Reading between the lines: from a formal marriage of trade rules and labour rights to a possible (clandestine) liaison? 9. Decentralised Linkages: A Mixed Blessing for the ILO? I. A mixed blessing from the viewpoint of implementing ILO standards and procedures II. A limited 'enforcement' blessing for workers III. Conclusion: Is there more to the phenomenon than meets the eye? Part IV The 'Market for Social Justice' to the Rescue of The ILO's Persuasive Capacities? 10. A Lopsided 'Market for Social Justice' Calling for Public Involvement I. Consumer preferences to the rescue of failing state resolve II. Public supply of information to overcome market failure 11. Meeting Transnational Demand with a Transnational Supply: A Jointly Established Labelling System I. From the difficulties of 'labelled at destination' to the possibilities of 'labelled at the origin' II. Need for a multilateral system of mutual recognition and impartial verification III. To guarantee what? Effective application by each party of legislation satisfying agreed international labour standards IV. In conclusion: Is there a market for a market-based approach to social justice? Conclusion: Reinventing the ILO? I. Three necessary and feasible aspects of an institutional reinvention II. Which requires mobilising all actors and drawing on its full array of transformative powers III. And widening the horizon of social justice
{{comment.content}}