Retired US General Barry McCaffrey, returning from a recent visit to Iraq, provided an upbeat assessment of the six-year war there claiming that the United States is now clearly in the end game in that theatre. He judged that there was a dramatic and growing momentum for economic and security stability which is unlikely to be reversible. If this proves to be the case, the US will have rescued the situation from near disaster. The other counter-insurgency campaign in Afghanistan is yet to reach such a tipping point. With these apparent changes in fortune, the timing and thrust of Paul Rogersâs Why Weâre Losing the War on Terror is perhaps unfortunate. The question in his title encapsulates the core problem with the book, and not just because it implies a subjective pre-conception that the âwar on terrorâ (whatever that is) is lost. Rogersâ approach is to chronicle recent events in lieu of analysis. This also evades the necessity to focus on the
{{comment.content}}