It is strange to find Mr. Bosanquet stating that Logic has no criterion of truth or test of reasoning (logic, vol. I. P. One may fairly ask how he can maintain such a position in the face of his declaration that for logic at all events it is a postulate that the truth is the whole? What is such a proposition except a criterion of truth, a criterion, moreover, which he is at pains to apply throughout his entire work?
{{comment.content}}