Introduction Chapter One: Decisions Made in Real Time Chapter Two: What we know about advisory dialogue and courts Chapter Three: Judicial Review in Real Time - Use of Interim Decisions Chapter Four: Supreme Court Practice and Dialogue Chapter Five: Deviating from the Rules of the Game Chapter Six: Recommendations Chapter Seven: Signaling in judgments Chapter Eight: Dialogue on Policy Application - I Chapter Nine: Dialogue on Policy Application - II Chapter Ten: Dialogue With Military Authorities Chapter Eleven: Dialogue With the Attorney General office Chapter Twelve: Dialogue With Petitioners And Human Rights Organizations Invitations to override Chapter Thirteen: Dialogue with Victims of Terrorism, Families of Soldieries and Bereaved Families Chapter Fourteen: Features of Inter-Branch Dialogue in National Security Cases in Israel Chapter Fifteen: Judicial Review in Real Time Chapter Sixteen: Benefits of the Use of Advisory Dialogue Chapter Seventeen: The Use of Advisory Dialogue - Disadvantages and Risks Chapter Eighteen: Conclusion - Judicial Review and national security Appendix A Judicial panels in judgments where fundamental decisions constituting precedents against the state were given Appendix B Dates of Principal Rulings Comprising Precedents Against the State, in View of the Number of Israelis Injured in Terrorist Attacks 1996-2005 Bibliography Index
{{comment.content}}